What is Value at Risk (VaR)?
Value at Risk (VaR) estimates the maximum expected portfolio loss over a chosen time horizon at a specified confidence level. Banks, asset managers, and risk committees use VaR to set capital buffers, monitor trading desks, and compare strategies under a common loss metric. Basel market-risk frameworks reference VaR-style models for regulatory capital.
VaR answers a practical question: how much could I lose on a normal bad day? Pair VaR with return diagnostics from the Sharpe ratio calculator, systematic exposure from the portfolio beta calculator, and worst peak-to-trough loss from the maximum drawdown calculator for a fuller risk picture.
Parametric (variance-covariance) VaR
The parametric method assumes returns are normally distributed. You supply daily expected return and volatility, scale them to the holding period, and apply the confidence-level z-score from the standard normal distribution.
Common one-tailed z-scores are 1.282 for 90% confidence, 1.645 for 95%, and 2.326 for 99%. Dollar VaR equals portfolio value multiplied by VaR percentage divided by 100.
Worked example: parametric VaR
A $100,000 portfolio with 2% daily volatility, 0% expected daily return, 95% confidence, and a 1-day horizon produces:
- Scaled volatility: 2% × √1 = 2%
- VaR%: -(0% - 1.645 × 2%) = 3.29%
- Dollar VaR: $100,000 × 3.29% = $3,290
Interpretation: on 95% of trading days, losses should not exceed $3,290. On the worst 5% of days, losses may be larger.
Historical simulation VaR
Historical simulation avoids normality assumptions. You feed a series of realized daily returns, sort them from worst to best, and read the loss at the desired tail percentile. The horizon VaR scales by the square root of time, consistent with parametric scaling.
Historical VaR captures fat tails and skew when your sample is long enough. A minimum of five return observations is required, but practitioners typically use hundreds of daily returns for stability.
Interpreting confidence levels and horizons
A 95% one-day VaR does not cap losses at that number. It means losses exceed VaR on roughly 5% of days. Extending the horizon from 1 day to 10 days increases VaR by roughly √10 under the square-root-of-time rule, assuming independent daily returns.
VaR is a forward-looking statistical estimate, not a guarantee. Stress testing, scenario analysis, and conditional VaR (expected shortfall) complement VaR when tail risk matters. For position sizing based on stop-loss distance, see the position size calculator.
Frequently asked questions
What does 95% VaR mean in plain language?
When should I use parametric vs historical VaR?
Why scale volatility by the square root of time?
Does VaR include positive expected return?
What are the main limitations of VaR?
How is VaR used in portfolio risk management?
Resources and references
The formulas and methods in this calculator were checked against these independent sources.